Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 08:49
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sean McVay: Matthew Stafford-Davante Adams relationship is "cool to watch" - NBC Sports
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Israel says it killed 9 Iranian nuclear scientists, and braces for attacks from Iran - NPR
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Don't miss the half-lit first quarter moon rise tonight — Here's what to look for - Space
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Another huge U.S. airline faces bankruptcy risk - TheStreet
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Scientists investigate parasite's lifecycle to combat deadly Chagas disease - Phys.org